donderdag 13 december 2012

Hacked Review System Leads To Fake Reviews and Retraction of Scientific Papers

How to be a successful scientist:
1. Create a fake reviewer account
2. Peer-review your own work
3. Publish!

 
 

Sent to you by Jonas via Google Reader:

 
 

via Slashdot by Unknown Lamer on 12/12/12

dstates writes "Retraction Watch reports that fake reviewer information was placed in Elsevier's peer review database allowing unethical authors to review their own or colleagues manuscripts. As a result, 11 scientific publications have been retracted. The hack is particularly embarrassing for Elsevier because the commercial publisher has been arguing that the quality of its review process justifies its restrictive access policies and high costs of the journals it publishes."

Share on Google+

Read more of this story at Slashdot.




 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

woensdag 12 december 2012

Confuse Your Illusion: Feedback to Early Visual Cortex Contributes to Percep...

 
 

Aan u verzonden door Pieter via Google Reader:

 
 

via Psychological Science RSS feed -- Preview Articles door Wokke, M. E., Vandenbroucke, A. R. E., Scholte, H. S., Lamme, V. A. F. op 10-12-12

A striking example of the constructive nature of visual perception is how the human visual system completes contours of occluded objects. To date, it is unclear whether perceptual completion emerges during early stages of visual processing or whether higher-level mechanisms are necessary. To answer this question, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation to disrupt signaling in V1/V2 and in the lateral occipital (LO) area at different moments in time while participants performed a discrimination task involving a Kanizsa-type illusory figure. Results show that both V1/V2 and higher-level visual area LO are critically involved in perceptual completion. However, these areas seem to be involved in an inverse hierarchical fashion, in which the critical time window for V1/V2 follows that for LO. These results are in line with the growing evidence that feedback to V1/V2 contributes to perceptual completion.


 
 

Dingen die u vanaf hier kunt doen:

 
 

maandag 10 december 2012

Dynamic coding of border-ownership in visual cortex

 
 

Sent to you by Frouke via Google Reader:

 
 

via Journal of Vision recent issues by Layton, O. W., Mingolla, E., Yazdanbakhsh, A. on 12/6/12

Abstract Humans are capable of rapidly determining whether regions in a visual scene appear as figures in the foreground or as background, yet how figure-ground segregation occurs in the primate visual system is unknown. Figures in the environment are perceived to own their borders, and recent neurophysiology has demonstrated that certain cells in primate visual area V2 have border-ownership selectivity. We present a dynamic model based on physiological data that indicates areas V1, V2, and V4 act as an interareal network to determine border-ownership. Our model predicts that competition between curvature- sensitive cells in V4 that have on-surround receptive fields of different sizes can determine likely figure locations and rapidly propagate the information interareally to V2 border-ownership cells that receive contrast information from V1. In the model border-ownership is an emergent property produced by the dynamic interactions between V1, V2, and V4, one which could not be determined by any single cortical area alone.

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

maandag 3 december 2012

Perceived causalities of physical events are influenced by social cues.

 
 

Sent to you by Frouke via Google Reader:

 
 

via Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance - Vol 38, Iss 6 by Zhou, Jifan; Huang, Xiang; Jin, Xinyi; Liang, Junying; Shui, Rende; Shen, Mowei on 4/16/12

In simple mechanical events, we can directly perceive causal interactions of the physical objects. Physical cues (especially spatiotemporal features of the display) are found to associate with causal perception. Here, we demonstrate that cues of a completely different domain— social cues—also impact the causal perception of physical events: The causally ambiguous events are more likely to be perceived as causal if the faces superimposed on the objects change from neutral to fearful. This effect has the following major properties: (a) The effect is caused by social information because it disappears when the faces are inverted or when the expression changes are unreasonable; (b) the social cues are integrated in a temporal window different from physical cues; and (c) the social cues impact the perception process rather than the decision process as the impact also appears in the causality-induced illusion. These findings suggest that the visual system relies on social information to infer the causal structure of the physical world. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Perceptual grouping allows for attention to cover noncontiguous locations an...

 
 

Sent to you by Frouke via Google Reader:

 
 

via Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance - Vol 38, Iss 6 by Kerzel, Dirk; Born, Sabine; Schönhammer, Josef on 3/19/12

A salient stimulus may interrupt visual search because of attentional capture. It has been shown that attentional capture occurs with a wide, but not with a small attentional window. We tested the hypothesis that capture depends more strongly on the shape of the attentional window than on its size. Search elements were arranged in two nested rings. The ring containing the search target remained fixed, while a salient color singleton occurred either in the same or in the other ring. We observed that color singletons only disrupted search when shown in the same ring as the search target. It is important to note that, when focusing on the outer array, which presumably required a larger attentional window, singletons on the inner array did not capture attention. In contrast to the original attentional window hypothesis, our results show that attentional capture does not always occur with a large attentional window. Rather, attention can be flexibly allocated to the set of relevant stimulus locations and attentional capture is confined to the attended locations. Further experiments showed that attention was allocated to search elements that were perceptually grouped into "whole" or "Gestalt"-like objects, which prevented attentional capture from nearby locations. However, when attention was allocated to noncontiguous locations that did not form a perceptual Gestalt, nearby locations elicited attentional capture. Perceptual grouping could be based on a combination of color and position, but not on color alone. Thus, the allocation of attention to Gestalt-like objects that were jointly defined by similarity and proximity prevented attentional capture from nearby locations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

donderdag 29 november 2012

The Problem With Math Is That It Makes People Seem Smart


 
 
Shared via feedly // published on Peer-reviewed by my neurons // visit site
The Problem With Math Is That It Makes People Seem Smart

In 1996 physicist Alan Sokal succeeded in getting a unique article published in the journal Social Text. The article was titled "Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity," and it was unique because it was complete gibberish. Known as the Sokal Hoax, it was a crowning moment for pretense-haters everywhere.

While journal editors have managed to avoid similar public shamings of late, a Swedish researcher named Kimmo Eriksson decided to investigate whether academics are in fact impressed by things they don't understand, even if those things are nonsense. Specifically, Eriksson wanted to see how people with research experience judged abstracts containing a nonsense math equation (pdf):

Participants were presented with the abstracts from two published papers (one in evolutionary anthropology and one in sociology). Based on these abstracts, participants were asked to judge the quality of the research. Either one or the other of the two abstracts was manipulated through the inclusion of an extra sentence taken from a completely unrelated paper and presenting an equation that made no sense in the context. The abstract that included the meaningless mathematics tended to be judged of higher quality. However, this "nonsense math effect" was not found among participants with degrees in mathematics, science, technology or medicine.

Obviously it's distressing to see research-savvy people base their judgments on nonsense, but beyond that there are two ways to spin the deeper meaning of the findings. The positive spin is that because math is judged to add quality, people will be motivated to learn and use mathematics. The negative spin is that math improves judgments of quality because it suggests the mastery of a difficult skill that people want no part of. In this case math has been shut out to the point that an equation is strictly a signal rather than something to be understood and evaluated.

The potential to develop this kind of hands-off attitude toward math is one reason it's important not to let elementary school kids take on a "math is not for me" identity. It's fine if a kid decides not to become an engineer, but it can be problematic if you're so uncomfortable with math that you develop faulty heuristics to use when your have to deal with it.
————————————————————————————————————————————————-
Eriksson, Kimmo (2012). The nonsense math effect Judgment and Decision Making, 7 (6), 746-749


dinsdag 20 november 2012

An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scie...

 
 

Sent to you by Jonas via Google Reader:

 
 

via pubmed: top authors by Kriegeskorte N, Walther A, Deca D on 11/20/12

An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishing.

Front Comput Neurosci. 2012;6:94

Authors: Kriegeskorte N, Walther A, Deca D

PMID: 23162460 [PubMed - in process]


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

woensdag 7 november 2012

Cite from search results

Finally!

 
 

Naudojant „Google Reader" atsiųsta jums nuo Jonas:

 
 

per Google Scholar Blog autorius jconnor 12.10.17

I remember writing research papers as a student and being frustrated at the tedium of formatting citations according to the strictures of the Modern Language Association.  Today we're simplifying this process by adding the ability to copy-and-paste formatted citations from search results.  To copy a formatted citation, click on the "Cite" link below a search result and select from the available citation styles (currently MLA, APA, or Chicago):

You can also use one of the import links to import the citation into BibTeX or another bibliography manager.  We hope that simplifying the chore of citation formatting will let you focus on what you really want to work on: writing a great paper!

Posted by: James Connor, Software Engineer


 
 

Veiksmai, kuriuos dabar galite atlikti:

 
 

maandag 5 november 2012

Top-Down Feedback in an HMAX-Like Cortical Model of Object Perception Based on Hierarchical Bayesian Networks and Belief Propagation

HMAX, now with feedback... Sander
 
 
Shared via feedly // published on PLoS ONE Alerts: Neuroscience // visit site
Top-Down Feedback in an HMAX-Like Cortical Model of Object Perception Based on Hierarchical Bayesian Networks and Belief Propagation

by Salvador Dura-Bernal, Thomas Wennekers, Susan L. Denham

Hierarchical generative models, such as Bayesian networks, and belief propagation have been shown to provide a theoretical framework that can account for perceptual processes, including feedforward recognition and feedback modulation. The framework explains both psychophysical and physiological experimental data and maps well onto the hierarchical distributed cortical anatomy. However, the complexity required to model cortical processes makes inference, even using approximate methods, very computationally expensive. Thus, existing object perception models based on this approach are typically limited to tree-structured networks with no loops, use small toy examples or fail to account for certain perceptual aspects such as invariance to transformations or feedback reconstruction. In this study we develop a Bayesian network with an architecture similar to that of HMAX, a biologically-inspired hierarchical model of object recognition, and use loopy belief propagation to approximate the model operations (selectivity and invariance). Crucially, the resulting Bayesian network extends the functionality of HMAX by including top-down recursive feedback. Thus, the proposed model not only achieves successful feedforward recognition invariant to noise, occlusions, and changes in position and size, but is also able to reproduce modulatory effects such as illusory contour completion and attention. Our novel and rigorous methodology covers key aspects such as learning using a layerwise greedy algorithm, combining feedback information from multiple parents and reducing the number of operations required. Overall, this work extends an established model of object recognition to include high-level feedback modulation, based on state-of-the-art probabilistic approaches. The methodology employed, consistent with evidence from the visual cortex, can be potentially generalized to build models of hierarchical perceptual organization that include top-down and bottom-up interactions, for example, in other sensory modalities.

zaterdag 27 oktober 2012

Bilateral Theta-Burst TMS to Influence Global Gestalt Perception

 
 

Aan u verzonden door Pieter via Google Reader:

 
 

via PLoS ONE Alerts: Neuroscience door Bernd Ritzinger et al. op 26-10-12

by Bernd Ritzinger, Elisabeth Huberle, Hans-Otto Karnath

While early and higher visual areas along the ventral visual pathway in the inferotemporal cortex are critical for the recognition of individual objects, the neural representation of human perception of complex global visual scenes remains under debate. Stroke patients with a selective deficit in the perception of a complex global Gestalt with intact recognition of individual objects – a deficit termed simultanagnosia – greatly helped to study this question. Interestingly, simultanagnosia typically results from bilateral lesions of the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ). The present study aimed to verify the relevance of this area for human global Gestalt perception. We applied continuous theta-burst TMS either unilaterally (left or right) or bilateral simultaneously over TPJ. Healthy subjects were presented with hierarchically organized visual stimuli that allowed parametrical degrading of the object at the global level. Identification of the global Gestalt was significantly modulated only for the bilateral TPJ stimulation condition. Our results strengthen the view that global Gestalt perception in the human brain involves TPJ and is co-dependent on both hemispheres.

 
 

Dingen die u vanaf hier kunt doen:

 
 

dinsdag 23 oktober 2012

Open evaluation: a vision for entirely transparent post-publication peer rev...

 
 

Naudojant „Google Reader" atsiųsta jums nuo Jonas:

 
 

per pubmed: top authors autorius Kriegeskorte N 12.10.23

Related Articles

Open evaluation: a vision for entirely transparent post-publication peer review and rating for science.

Front Comput Neurosci. 2012;6:79

Authors: Kriegeskorte N

Abstract
The two major functions of a scientific publishing system are to provide access to and evaluation of scientific papers. While open access (OA) is becoming a reality, open evaluation (OE), the other side of the coin, has received less attention. Evaluation steers the attention of the scientific community and thus the very course of science. It also influences the use of scientific findings in public policy. The current system of scientific publishing provides only journal prestige as an indication of the quality of new papers and relies on a non-transparent and noisy pre-publication peer-review process, which delays publication by many months on average. Here I propose an OE system, in which papers are evaluated post-publication in an ongoing fashion by means of open peer review and rating. Through signed ratings and reviews, scientists steer the attention of their field and build their reputation. Reviewers are motivated to be objective, because low-quality or self-serving signed evaluations will negatively impact their reputation. A core feature of this proposal is a division of powers between the accumulation of evaluative evidence and the analysis of this evidence by paper evaluation functions (PEFs). PEFs can be freely defined by individuals or groups (e.g., scientific societies) and provide a plurality of perspectives on the scientific literature. Simple PEFs will use averages of ratings, weighting reviewers (e.g., by H-index), and rating scales (e.g., by relevance to a decision process) in different ways. Complex PEFs will use advanced statistical techniques to infer the quality of a paper. Papers with initially promising ratings will be more deeply evaluated. The continual refinement of PEFs in response to attempts by individuals to influence evaluations in their own favor will make the system ungameable. OA and OE together have the power to revolutionize scientific publishing and usher in a new culture of transparency, constructive criticism, and collaboration.

PMID: 23087639 [PubMed - in process]


 
 

Veiksmai, kuriuos dabar galite atlikti:

 
 

"ViSA: A neurodynamic model for visuo-spatial working memory, attentional bl...

 
 

Sent to you by Frouke via Google Reader:

 
 

via Psychological Review - Vol 119, Iss 4 by Simione, Luca; Raffone, Antonino; Wolters, Gezinus; Salmas, Paola; Nakatani, Chie; Belardinelli, Marta Olivetti; van Leeuwen, Cees on 10/22/12

Reports an error in "ViSA: A Neurodynamic Model for Visuo-Spatial Working Memory, Attentional Blink, and Conscious Access" by Luca Simione, Antonino Raffone, Gezinus Wolters, Paola Salmas, Chie Nakatani, Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Cees van Leeuwen ( Psychological Review, Advanced Online Publication, Jul 23, 2012, np). The article was published online missing the link to the supplemental materials. The link to the supplemental materials is provided in the erratum. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2012-19411-001.) Two separate lines of study have clarified the role of selectivity in conscious access to visual information. Both involve presenting multiple targets and distracters: one simultaneously in a spatially distributed fashion, the other sequentially at a single location. To understand their findings in a unified framework, we propose a neurodynamic model for Visual Selection and Awareness (ViSA). ViSA supports the view that neural representations for conscious access and visuo-spatial working memory are globally distributed and are based on recurrent interactions between perceptual and access control processors. Its flexible global workspace mechanisms enable a unitary account of a broad range of effects: It accounts for the limited storage capacity of visuo-spatial working memory, attentional cueing, and efficient selection with multi-object displays, as well as for the attentional blink and associated sparing and masking effects. In particular, the speed of consolidation for storage in visuo-spatial working memory in ViSa is not fixed but depends adaptively on the input and recurrent signaling. Slowing down of consolidation due to weak bottom-up and recurrent input as a result of brief presentation and masking leads to the attentional blink. Thus, ViSA goes beyond earlier 2-stage and neuronal global workspace accounts of conscious processing limitations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

ViSA: A neurodynamic model for visuo-spatial working memory, attentional bli...

 
 

Sent to you by Frouke via Google Reader:

 
 

via Psychological Review - Vol 119, Iss 4 by Simione, Luca; Raffone, Antonino; Wolters, Gezinus; Salmas, Paola; Nakatani, Chie; Belardinelli, Marta Olivetti; van Leeuwen, Cees on 7/23/12

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 119(4) of Psychological Review (see record 2012-27828-002). The article was published online missing the link to the supplemental materials. The link to the supplemental materials is provided in the erratum.] Two separate lines of study have clarified the role of selectivity in conscious access to visual information. Both involve presenting multiple targets and distracters: one simultaneously in a spatially distributed fashion, the other sequentially at a single location. To understand their findings in a unified framework, we propose a neurodynamic model for Visual Selection and Awareness (ViSA). ViSA supports the view that neural representations for conscious access and visuo-spatial working memory are globally distributed and are based on recurrent interactions between perceptual and access control processors. Its flexible global workspace mechanisms enable a unitary account of a broad range of effects: It accounts for the limited storage capacity of visuo-spatial working memory, attentional cueing, and efficient selection with multi-object displays, as well as for the attentional blink and associated sparing and masking effects. In particular, the speed of consolidation for storage in visuo-spatial working memory in ViSA is not fixed but depends adaptively on the input and recurrent signaling. Slowing down of consolidation due to weak bottom-up and recurrent input as a result of brief presentation and masking leads to the attentional blink. Thus, ViSA goes beyond earlier 2-stage and neuronal global workspace accounts of conscious processing limitations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Bistable Gestalts reduce activity in the whole of V1, not just the retinotop...

 
 

Sent to you by Frouke via Google Reader:

 
 

via Journal of Vision recent issues by de-Wit, L. H., Kubilius, J., Wagemans, J., Op de Beeck, H. P. on 10/22/12

Abstract Activity in the primary visual cortex reduces when certain stimuli can be perceptually organized as a unified Gestalt. This reduction could offer important insights into the nature of feedback computations within the human visual system; however, the properties of this response reduction have not yet been investigated in detail. Here we replicate this reduced V1 response, but find that the modulation in V1 (and V2) to the perceived organization of the input is not specific to the retinotopic location at which the sensory input from that stimulus is represented. Instead, we find a response modulation that is equally evident across the primary visual cortex. Thus in contradiction to some models of hierarchical predictive coding, the perception of an organized Gestalt causes a broad feedback effect that does not act specifically on the part of the retinotopic map representing the sensory input.

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

vrijdag 19 oktober 2012

The beauty of being wrong: A plea for post-publication revision


 
 
Shared via feedly // published on Welcome to cogsci.nl // visit site
The beauty of being wrong: A plea for post-publication revision

I realize that most of what I will ever write as a scientist is wrong. Not because it is obviously wrong when I write it, or because I don't believe in my own research. But simply because virtually every insight is eventually replaced by some newer and generally more accurate insight. This is true even for the great theories of the likes of Darwin, Einstein, and Newton. And it is certainly true for the minor contributions of the remaining 99.99% of the research population, for whom supersession generally occurs quite rapidly.

Unfortunately, there are no such signs in science

Perhaps this sounds depressing, but it's really not. It's just a (negative) way of describing progress. It's a good thing. Scientists should be encouraged to acknowledge the wrongness of their theories, to find out what's so wrong about them, and to replace them by newer theories that are still wrong, but less so. You could even argue that the possibility of being wrong is what differentiates science from opinionist fields such as philosophy, art, and economics.

But the ideal model of a scientist who continually seeks to disprove himself is not very compatible with human nature. Being human after all, scientists hate to be proven wrong, and will go through great lengths (including plain denial) to avoid this from happening. Nevertheless, given a healthy environment, scientists can, to some extent, overcome their innate dislike of being wrong. But only given a healthy scientific environment. And this is, in my opinion, where things go, well... wrong.

Lately, there has been much ado about reforms of academic publishing. Most of the debate has focused on the slow, but steady shift towards open access models (i.e. making scientific papers publicly accessible). I'm a big proponent of open access, but I also think that there are deeper problems that go beyond copyright issues. More specifically, I think that the way in which scientific results are presented is detrimental to a healthy scientific climate.


donderdag 27 september 2012

Grouping, pooling, and when bigger is better in visual crowding

 
 

Sent to you by Frouke via Google Reader:

 
 

via Journal of Vision recent issues by Manassi, M., Sayim, B., Herzog, M. H. on 9/26/12

Abstract In crowding, perception of a target is strongly deteriorated by nearby elements. Crowding is often explained by pooling models predicting that adding flankers increases crowding. In contrast, the centroid hypothesis proposes that adding flankers decreases crowding—"bigger is better." In foveal vision, we have recently shown that adding flankers can increase or decrease crowding depending on whether the target groups or ungroups from the flankers. We have further shown how configural effects, such as good and global Gestalt, determine crowding. Foveal and peripheral crowding do not always reveal the same characteristics. Here, we show that the very same grouping and Gestalt results of foveal vision are also found in the periphery. These results can neither be explained by simple pooling nor by centroid models. We discuss when bigger is better and how grouping might shape crowding.

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

maandag 17 september 2012

Organizing probabilistic models of perception

 

 

Feed: TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES
Posted on: zaterdag 15 september 2012 2:00
Author: TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES
Subject: Organizing probabilistic models of perception

 

Wei Ji Ma. Probability has played a central role in models of perception for more than a century, but a look at probabilistic concepts in the literature raises many questions. Is being Bayesian the same as b....


View article...

Suggested by Maarten.

zondag 9 september 2012

Building the Perfect Journal


 
Building the Perfect Journal
Published on Percolator | shared via feedly

Harris Cooper (Duke University)

When Harris Cooper was asked to help start a new psychology journal, he said yes, but with a few conditions. He wanted to design not just a new journal, but a different kind of journal, one that attempted to fix the problems that the field of psychology has been struggling with, like high-profile researchers who commit fraud (see Stapel and Smeesters), and papers that attract a lot of attention yet can't be replicated (see Bem).

He wanted to build the perfect journal, or as close to it as possible.

The result is Archives of Scientific Psychology, published by the American Psychological Association and edited by Cooper, a professor of psychology and neuroscience at Duke, and Gary R. VandenBos, executive director of APA's publications office. It really is remarkable and could be the model for other journals. Certainly that's what Cooper hopes.

For starters, when an author submits a paper, he or she will have to fill out a standard questionnaire explaining the "rationale, method, results, and interpretation" of the study. There will be a discussion forum (that was VandenBos's idea) that will allow authors, reviewers, and others to comment on the paper—not unusual on the Internet, but not normal for an academic journal.

Authors will have to provide two abstracts, one technical and one written in plain English. They will also have to write a nontechnical method section explaining how the study worked, who the participants were, etc. Plenty of papers have such sections, but the emphasis here is on straightforward brevity, an effort to force researchers to communicate clearly.

But here's the most important part: Authors also have to provide the data used in the paper so others can review and (if they wish) attempt to replicate the findings. In some ways, this sounds like a no-brainer. Why wouldn't you submit your data if everything's aboveboard?

One reason is that you don't want another researcher to steal the data you worked so hard to collect. Cooper and company have tried to deal with this problem by requiring researchers who use the data to make the researchers who collected it co-authors on their papers. So the idea is, rather than someone else taking credit for your work unfairly, you get a publication added to your CV. Also, those who use the data agree that if they find an error, they will inform the authors first.

The journal is open access, too, naturally. Says Cooper: "We're undertaking a venture that embodies the value of science from Day 1."

He is particularly attuned to the problems psychology has faced recently. For the last four years, Cooper has been the chief editorial adviser for 70 journals published by the APA. That means whenever there's a conundrum or an accusation, he's the one dealing with it.

Cooper hopes that if the journal is a success, others will follow suit, and that in future explaining your methods, writing clearly, and providing your data to other researchers won't be regarded as newsworthy.


vrijdag 31 augustus 2012

Picasso in the mind’s eye of the beholder: Three-dimensional filling-in of a...

 
 

Sent to you by Frouke via Google Reader:

 
 


Publication year: 2012
Source:Cognition
Jan Koenderink, Andrea van Doorn, Johan Wagemans
Cartoon-style line drawings contain very condensed information, after all most of the page stays blank. Yet, they constrain the contents of immediate visual awareness to an extraordinary extent. This is true even for drawings that are – though nominally "representational" – not even in central projection. Moreover, the strokes used in a drawing may stand for a bewildering variety of entities in the world. We studied Picasso drawings from the 1940s in which the artist famously combined multiple viewpoints. We find that the pictorial reliefs obtained from various observers agree to a large extent, and that the differences are of a very specific nature, typically involving variations in the mutual spatial attitudes of rigid body parts in figure studies. Although the purely planar layout of the drawings accounts for much of visual awareness, observers also use the sparse depth cues provided by the artist to evoke volumetric impressions. Observers also freely insert "template knowledge" about the structure of familiar generic objects.

Highlights

► Cartoon-style line drawings constrain the contents of immediate visual awareness. ► Observers perceive body parts of depicted human figures in idiosyncratic attitudes. ► Observers use sparse depth cues used by the artist to evoke volumetric impressions. ► Observers freely insert "template knowledge" about generic object structure.

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

donderdag 16 augustus 2012

Grouping by closure influences subjective regularity and implicit preference...

 
 

Sent to you by Frouke via Google Reader:

 
 

via i-Perception by Pion on 8/15/12

A reflection between a pair of contours is more rapidly detected than a translation, but this effect is stronger when the contours are closed to form a single object compared to when they are closed to form 2 objects with a gap between them. That is, grouping changes the relative salience of different regularities. We tested whether this manipulation would also change preference for reflection or translation. We measured preference for these patterns using the Implicit Association Test (IAT). On some trials, participants saw words that were either positive or negative and had to classify them as quickly as possible. On interleaved trials, they saw reflection or translation patterns and again had to classify them. Participants were faster when 1 button was used for reflection and positive words and another button was used for translation and negative words, compared to when the reverse response mapping was used (translation and positive vs. reflection and negative). This reaction time difference indicates an implicit preference for reflection over translation. However, the size of the implicit preference was significantly reduced in the Two-objects condition. We concluded that factors that affect perceptual sensitivity also systematically affect implicit preference formation.

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

woensdag 8 augustus 2012

The integration of straight contours (snakes and ladders): the role of spati...

 
 

Sent to you by Frouke via Google Reader:

 
 

via Vision Research on 8/8/12

Publication year: 2012
Source:Vision Research
Rosilari Bellacosa Marotti, Andrea Pavan, Clara Casco
In the present study we addressed the issue of whether the Gestalt principle of grouping by similarity (iso-orientation) subtends extraction of straight contours made up of disconnected, iso-oriented Gabor elements, whether collinear (snakes) or parallel (ladders). To prevent the use of the most obvious grouping principle of good continuation, which allows us to perceive the relation between local and global orientation along the contour, we manipulated the spatial arrangement of randomly oriented Gabors in the background: they were positioned on an ordered grid, and grouped on the basis of good continuation, or randomly positioned and not grouped. Grid-positioned backgrounds exert a suppressive contextual influence on detection of good continuation along the contour path. Results obtained in a two-interval forced choice task showed that the orderly-positioned background did not completely prevent detection of snakes and ladders. Detection of snakes was hampered at low spatial frequency whereas detection of ladders was improved by the randomly-positioned background at high spatial frequency. These contextual influences support the suggestion that both iso-orientation and good continuation rules are employed by the association field underlying the binding of straight contours. In addition, they are not compatible with integration of snakes and ladders elements within a single receptive field. In support of this suggestion we found that phase constancy within contour elements (as opposed to phase randomization) improved snake detectability at low spatial frequency, and, unexpectedly, impaired ladder detectability at high spatial frequency. This suggests that a low-level mechanism based on the balance between excitatory and inhibitory lateral interactions at a first stage may account for the detection of both straight contours.

Highlights

► In this study we examined the integration of straight snake and ladder contours. ► We used a randomly- and a grid-positioned background to test global context effects. ► We tested the effects of three spatial frequencies and of phase randomization. ► We found that snakes only are hampered by background manipulation at low frequencies. ► Phase randomization only impairs snake detection and only at low spatial frequencies.

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

dinsdag 31 juli 2012

Motion correspondence in the Ternus display shows feature bias in spatiotopi...

 
 

Sent to you by Frouke via Google Reader:

 
 

via Journal of Vision recent issues by Hein, E., Cavanagh, P. on 7/30/12

AbstractHow is the visual system able to maintain object identity as the objects or the eyes move? While many early studies have shown small or no influence of feature information on this correspondence process, more recent studies have shown large feature effects. Here we investigated if this incongruity might be due to the distance over which the feature influence has an effect. We used a variation of the Ternus display (Ternus, 1926), an ambiguous apparent motion display, in which two sets of three discs are presented and one can perceive either three discs moving together (group motion) or one disc jumping across the other two discs (element motion). We biased the percept toward element motion by matching the features of some of the discs. In Experiment 1, with the three discs aligned and moving vertically, we added a horizontal offset between the two sets of discs and found a strong bias toward element motion that decreased with increasing spatial offset. In Experiment 3 participants had to make horizontal saccades across the same Ternus displays so that the two Ternus frames were horizontally offset on the retina, but not in spatiotopic coordinates. We found that the bias showed a similar spatial range, but now it was clear that the range was set in spatial coordinates independently of the retinal position. These results show that feature information contributes to correspondence over a limited spatial range (Experiment 1) and that the range is imposed in spatial, not retinal, coordinates (Experiment 2).

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

woensdag 18 juli 2012

How Academics Face the World: A Study of 5829 Homepage Pictures

Quote of the day: Psychologists appear more like art academics than scientists".

 

[via RSS feed PLoS ONE alert: Neuroscience] (yep, neuroscience)

 

by Owen Churches, Rebecca Callahan, Dana Michalski, Nicola Brewer, Emma Turner, Hannah Amy Diane Keage, Nicole Annette Thomas, Mike Elmo Richard Nicholls

It is now standard practice, at Universities around the world, for academics to place pictures of themselves on a personal profile page maintained as part of their University's web-site. Here we investigated what these pictures reveal about the way academics see themselves. Since there is an asymmetry in the degree to which emotional information is conveyed by the face, with the left side being more expressive than the right, we hypothesised that academics in the sciences would seek to pose as non-emotional rationalists and put their right cheek forward, while academics in the arts would express their emotionality and pose with the left cheek forward. We sourced 5829 pictures of academics from their University websites and found that, consistent with the hypotheses, there was a significant difference in the direction of face posing between science academics and English academics with English academics showing a more leftward orientation. Academics in the Fine Arts and Performing Arts however, did not show the expected left cheek forward bias. We also analysed profile pictures of psychology academics and found a greater bias toward presenting the left check compared to science academics which makes psychologists appear more like arts academics than scientists. These findings indicate that the personal website pictures of academics mirror the cultural perceptions of emotional expressiveness across disciplines.


Artikel weergeven...

dinsdag 17 juli 2012

The role of crowding in contextual influences on contour integration

 
 

Sent to you by Frouke via Google Reader:

 
 

via Journal of Vision recent issues by Robol, V., Casco, C., Dakin, S. C. on 7/9/12

Abstract Dakin and Baruch (2009) investigated how context influences contour integration, specifically reporting that near-perpendicular surrounding-elements reduced the exposure-duration observers required to localize and determine the shape of contours (compared to performance with randomly oriented surrounds) while near-parallel surrounds increased this time. Here, we ask if this effect might be a manifestation of visual crowding (the disruptive influence of "visual clutter" on object recognition). We first report that the effect generalizes to simple contour-localization (without explicit shape-discrimination) and influences tolerance to orientation jitter in the same way it affects threshold exposure-duration. We next directly examined the role of crowding by quantifying observers' local uncertainty (about the orientation of the elements that comprised our contours), showing that this largely accounts for the effects of context on global contour integration. These findings support the idea that context influences contour integration at a predominantly local stage of processing and that the local effects of crowding eventually influence downstream stages in the cortical processing of visual form.

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

dinsdag 3 juli 2012

G r e a t e r / l e t t e r / s p a c i n g / helps reading in dyslexia

On crowding and dyslexia
 
G r e a t e r / l e t t e r / s p a c i n g / helps reading in dyslexia
Published on The Neurocritic | shared via feedly


Simply increasing the spacing between letters improves the reading ability of children with developmental dyslexia, according to a group of Italian and French researchers (Zorzi et al., 2012). Dyslexic children were 20% faster and twice as accurate when reading the altered text. This impressive result was obtained without any prior training whatsoever.

The study was based on the phenomenon of crowding, where the recognition of individual letters is impaired by the close proximity of surrounding letters. Children with dyslexia are disproportionately affected by crowding, compared to normally developing children (Martelli et al., 2009). Other aspects of the printed word are known to affect reading ability, but surprisingly little is known about letter spacing. The recommendations of the British Dyslexia Association include optimizing the size and type of font, page layout, headings, type of paper, and line spacing but not letter spacing.1

The collaborative effort was a deliberate attempt to compare two languages that have different types of spelling-to-sound translation. Italian has completely regular spelling rules (a transparent orthography), meaning there are no exception words. Each combination of printed letters is always pronounced in a consistent way. By contrast, written French is orthographically opaque, meaning that pesky irregular spellings can trip you up. This is true in English as well: compare the pronunciation of the word "pint" to "hint", "mint", and "lint". The /i/ sound wins out over the /ī/ sound, in terms of regularity.

In the study, 34 Italian and 40 French children with dyslexia were tested on two separate occasions at least two weeks apart. They read 24 short sentences, which were written in standard text in one session and highly spaced text in the other. The order of sessions was counterbalanced to control for practice effects,2 with half assigned to read the spaced text at T1 and the other half at T2. Reading accuracy (number of errors) and reading speed (number of syllables per second) both interacted with test session (p<.0001), indicating a drastic improvement with the highly spaced text. This was true for both the Italian and the French children with dyslexia.


Fig. 2 (Zorzi et al., 2012). (C) Reading accuracy (number of errors) in the normal and spaced text conditions for Italian dyslexics, French dyslexics, and a younger group of Italian control children matched for reading level (RL) to the Italian dyslexic sample.


It came as quite a surprise to me that no one had demonstrated this letter spacing effect before. But then again, I'm not familiar with the literature on developmental reading disorders, so perhaps Professor Dorothy Bishop or Livia Blackburne can provide a more critical take on an [apparently] amazing finding.

Finally, the authors have developed DYS, a free iPhone/iPad application. You can test out the spacing effect for yourself and submit your results anonymously, in the name of science!

For more information, see the WSJ Health Blog.


Footnotes

1 Also note that bold is preferable to italic, as the latter induces crowding.

2 A control experiment in a different group of children presented the normal and spaced text within a single session, again in counterbalanced order. The critical difference here was that different sentences were used in each condition, so practice effects wouldn't be an issue.


References

Martelli M, Di Filippo G, Spinelli D, Zoccolotti P (2009). Crowding, reading, and developmental dyslexia. J Vis 9: 14, 1–18.

Marco Zorzi, Chiara Barbiero, Andrea Facoetti, Isabella Lonciari, Marco Carrozzi, Marcella Montico, Laura Bravar, Florence George, Catherine Pech-Georgel, and Johannes C. Ziegler (2012). Extra-large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia. PNAS. doi:10.1073/pnas.1205566109.